Maitland v. City of Watertown
177 A.D. 950
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1917
StatusPublished
This text of 177 A.D. 950 (Maitland v. City of Watertown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maitland v. City of Watertown, 177 A.D. 950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and the respondent’s counsel having disclaimed that any ground exists for granting a new trial if the nonsuit was not properly granted, and the court having discovered none, the verdict of the jury is reinstated, with costs. All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
177 A.D. 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maitland-v-city-of-watertown-nyappdiv-1917.