Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co.

82 So. 397, 145 La. 434, 1919 La. LEXIS 1736
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 2, 1919·No. No. 23357·Published

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

The present appeal has. been taken from a judgment overruling a-motion to dissolve a provisional seizure; and motion is made to dismiss it, on the ground that the judgment is interlocutory and cannot work irreparable injury.

The judgment will be reviewable when the main suit comes here on appeal, if it ever does; and nothing shows that any harm [435] the provisional seizure may have caused or may yet cause to the defendant is not compensable in money. The judgment is therefore not appealable. Mesritz v. Marks, 22 La. Ann. 249; Wolff v. McKinney, 21 La. Ann. 634.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co., 82 So. 397, 145 La. 434, 1919 La. LEXIS 1736 (La. 1919).

82 So. 397 (Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolff v. McKinney
21 La. Ann. 634 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1869)
Mesritz v. Marks
22 La. Ann. 249 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1870)