Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co.

82 So. 397, 145 La. 434, 1919 La. LEXIS 1736
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 2, 1919
DocketNo. 23357
StatusPublished

This text of 82 So. 397 (Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maison Blanche Bldg. Annex, Inc. v. Nortropic Cabarrus Co., 82 So. 397, 145 La. 434, 1919 La. LEXIS 1736 (La. 1919).

Opinion

PROVOSTY, J.

The present appeal has. been taken from a judgment overruling a-motion to dissolve a provisional seizure; and motion is made to dismiss it, on the ground that the judgment is interlocutory and cannot work irreparable injury.

The judgment will be reviewable when the main suit comes here on appeal, if it ever does; and nothing shows that any harm [435]*435the provisional seizure may have caused or may yet cause to the defendant is not compensable in money. The judgment is therefore not appealable. Mesritz v. Marks, 22 La. Ann. 249; Wolff v. McKinney, 21 La. Ann. 634.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolff v. McKinney
21 La. Ann. 634 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1869)
Mesritz v. Marks
22 La. Ann. 249 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 397, 145 La. 434, 1919 La. LEXIS 1736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maison-blanche-bldg-annex-inc-v-nortropic-cabarrus-co-la-1919.