Maisel v. Shanholt

189 A.D. 831, 179 N.Y.S. 292, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4769
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1919·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff has mistaken his remedy. The option to renew for another two years, if exercised in time, needed no new lease for the additional term. (Orr v. Doubleday, Page & Co., [832]*832223 N. Y. 334.) Hence plaintiff pleaded no case for-specific performance, and the judgment and order must be reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs.

' Jenks, P. J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maisel v. Shanholt, 189 A.D. 831, 179 N.Y.S. 292, 1919 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

189 A.D. 831 (Maisel v. Shanholt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldberg v. Himlyn
121 Misc. 580 (New York County Courts, 1923)
Adelson v. Sacred Associates Realty Corp.
192 A.D. 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)