Mairs v. Lewis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mairs v. Lewis

67 A.D.2d 623, 412 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 4, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 623 (Mairs v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mairs v. Lewis, 67 A.D.2d 623, 412 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Determination of respondent Superintendent of Insurance, dated January 11, 1978, denying petitioner’s application for issuance of a license as a life insurance agent unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We conclude from our review of the record that respondent’s determination was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record and, accordingly, requires confirmation. We note the public policy embodied in subdivision (1) of section 752 of the Correction Law, which should be given appropriate consideration in cases of this nature. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Determination of respondent Superintendent of Insurance, dated January 11, 1978, denying petitioner’s application for issuance of a license as a life insurance agent unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We conclude from our review of the record that respondent’s determination was neither arbitrary nor capricious. The determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record and, accordingly, requires confirmation. We note the public policy embodied in subdivision (1) of section 752 of the Correction Law, which should be given appropriate consideration in cases of this nature. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 623, 412 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mairs-v-lewis-nyappdiv-1979.