Mairer v. Olmstead
24 F. 193
Opinion
The removal of this cause from the state court being after a term at which it could have been tried, and therefore too lato [194] under the act of 187S, is sought to be sustained by the act of 1866, (subdivision 2 of section 639, Rev. St. U. S.) But that clause is held to be repealed by the act of 1875, (Hyde v. Ruble, 104 U. S. 407,) although it had been held otherwise previously, by various state and circuit courts.
Motion to remand granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mairer v. Olmstead, 24 F. 193 (circtsdny 1885).
24 F. 193 (Mairer v. Olmstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hyde v. Ruble
104 U.S. 407 (Supreme Court, 1882)