Maira v. . Friedman
123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 706, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1092
This text of 123 N.E. 886 (Maira v. . Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maira v. . Friedman, 123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 706, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1092 (N.Y. 1919).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs to each set of respondents appearing by separate attorney; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 N.E. 886, 226 N.Y. 706, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maira-v-friedman-ny-1919.