Mair v. Lloyd Brothers Construction Company

682 P.2d 866, 1984 Utah LEXIS 854
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedMay 9, 1984
DocketNo. 18702
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 682 P.2d 866 (Mair v. Lloyd Brothers Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mair v. Lloyd Brothers Construction Company, 682 P.2d 866, 1984 Utah LEXIS 854 (Utah 1984).

Opinion

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a third-party complaint filed by the defendants.

The plaintiff was injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by her daughter when that vehicle collided with a truck driven by the defendant, Kevin Dean Sweat, and owned by his employer, defendant Lloyd Brothers Construction Company. Plaintiff brought suit against both defendants who in turn filed a third-party complaint against the plaintiffs daughter, Marla Mair Webb, alleging that she was negligent, that her negligence contributed to the accident, and that she was liable to the defendants for contribution to any damages for which they might be found liable. The trial court dismissed the third-party complaint on the motion of Mrs. Webb on the ground that she could not be legally liable for her mother’s injuries under our guest statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-9-1, and therefore she was not liable to the defendants for contribution to any damages which might be found against them.

While the appeal of the instant case was pending, we decided Malan v. Lewis, Utah, No. 17606, decided May 1, 1984, in which we declared our guest statute, § 41-9-1, unconstitutional. In view of that holding, Mrs. Webb could be found to be a joint tort feasor and thus subject to contribution to the defendants for any amount of damage adjudged against them.

The order dismissing the third-party complaint is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs are awarded to the defendants.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART and DURHAM, JJ., concur. OAKS, J., having resigned, does not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sorenson v. Aller
688 P.2d 463 (Utah Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
682 P.2d 866, 1984 Utah LEXIS 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mair-v-lloyd-brothers-construction-company-utah-1984.