Mair v. Barber

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2011
Docket10-7575
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mair v. Barber (Mair v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mair v. Barber, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7575

SHEROD MAIR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HESTER BARBER; SCOTT MEMMOTT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00492-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherod Mair, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Sherod Mair appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mair v.

Barber, No. 2:10-cv-00492-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mair v. Barber, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mair-v-barber-ca4-2011.