Mair v. Barber
This text of Mair v. Barber (Mair v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7575
SHEROD MAIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HESTER BARBER; SCOTT MEMMOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cv-00492-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 21, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherod Mair, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Sherod Mair appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mair v.
Barber, No. 2:10-cv-00492-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mair v. Barber, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mair-v-barber-ca4-2011.