Maione v. Zucker
This text of Maione v. Zucker (Maione v. Zucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ene eK SCOTT MAIONE AND TASHA OSTLER, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of their three infant children, Plaintiffs, -against- 18 CIVIL 7452 (KMK) JUDGMENT DR. HOWARD A. ZUCKER, et al., Defendants. eee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 15, 2022, both Motions are granted in full. All claims against Defendant Sherwood are dismissed without prejudice. All claims against the remaining Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. See Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 471 (2d Cir. 1978) (holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to "a third go-around"); Melvin v. County of Westchester, No. 14-CV-2995, 2016 WL 1254394, at *24 n.19 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2016) (granting motion to dismiss with prejudice where "[the] [p]laintiff has already had two bites at the apple, and they have proven fruitless" (alteration and quotation marks omitted)). Dated: New York, New York March 15, 2022
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K_ MANGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Maione v. Zucker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maione-v-zucker-nysd-2022.