Maio v. Arnett

203 A.D.2d 82, 610 N.Y.S.2d 781

This text of 203 A.D.2d 82 (Maio v. Arnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maio v. Arnett, 203 A.D.2d 82, 610 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered November 19, 1992, in favor of defendant Jan Arnett, M.D., upon a jury verdict finding that he was not negligent in plaintiffs treatment, unanimously affirmed without costs.

The trial court’s limiting of the scope of the direct and redirect examination of plaintiffs expert witness was not an abuse of discretion (see, Feldsberg v Nitschke, 49 NY2d 636). Nor did the trial court’s instruction to the jury on the law of "error in judgment” reach the level of reversible error. Concur —Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldsberg v. Nitschke
404 N.E.2d 1293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 82, 610 N.Y.S.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maio-v-arnett-nyappdiv-1994.