Maintenance Employes v. United States
This text of 375 U.S. 216 (Maintenance Employes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.
Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
375 U.S. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maintenance-employes-v-united-states-scotus-1963.