Mains v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mains v. State

544 So. 2d 1179, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1508, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3544, 1989 WL 67453

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 23, 1989

DocketNo. 87-02993

StatusPublished

This text of 544 So. 2d 1179 (Mains v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mains v. State, 544 So. 2d 1179, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1508, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3544, 1989 WL 67453 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order finding that he violated his probation by failing to pay the balance due of a fine during the seven year period of probation within which he was to pay the fine. We agree with defendant that since there was no finding of defendant’s ability to pay the fine, the finding that defendant violated his probation in that regard was erroneous. See Jordan v. State, 489 So.2d 224, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821, 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 377 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order finding that he violated his probation by failing to pay the balance due of a fine during the seven year period of probation within which he was to pay the fine. We agree with defendant that since there was no finding of defendant’s ability to pay the fine, the finding that defendant violated his probation in that regard was erroneous. See Jordan v. State, 489 So.2d 224, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821, 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Smith v. State, 377 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 So. 2d 1179, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1508, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3544, 1989 WL 67453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mains-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack