Mainlands of Tamarac, Ninth Section, Inc. v. Weidmaier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mainlands of Tamarac, Ninth Section, Inc. v. Weidmaier

371 So. 2d 95, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16216

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1976

DocketNo. 75-875

StatusPublished

This text of 371 So. 2d 95 (Mainlands of Tamarac, Ninth Section, Inc. v. Weidmaier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mainlands of Tamarac, Ninth Section, Inc. v. Weidmaier, 371 So. 2d 95, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16216 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that plaintiff established a prima facie case sufficient to withstand the entry of a final judgment based upon defendants’ motion for directed verdict (involuntary dismissal). Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972); Preisner v. Cropf, 278 So.2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as constituting any determination whatsoever on the relative merits of the respective parties’ claims and defenses.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MAGER, C. J., ALDERMAN, J., and WEAVER, SIDNEY M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that plaintiff established a prima facie case sufficient to withstand the entry of a final judgment based upon defendants’ motion for directed verdict (involuntary dismissal). Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509 (Fla.1972); Preisner v. Cropf, 278 So.2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as constituting any determination whatsoever on the relative merits of the respective parties’ claims and defenses.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

MAGER, C. J., ALDERMAN, J., and WEAVER, SIDNEY M., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 So. 2d 95, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mainlands-of-tamarac-ninth-section-inc-v-weidmaier-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack