Mainigi v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Mainigi v. Thompson

50 F. App'x 606

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2002·No. No. 01-1637·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kumar Mainigi appeals the district court’s order denying his claims under on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mainigi v. Thompson, No. CA-98-1088-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kumar Mainigi appeals the district court’s order denying his claims under on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mainigi v. Thompson, No. CA-98-1088-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mainigi v. Thompson, 50 F. App'x 606 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

50 F. App'x 606 (Mainigi v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related