Mainieri v. McLellan

211 A.2d 239, 125 Vt. 157, 1965 Vt. LEXIS 216
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJune 9, 1965
Docket336
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 211 A.2d 239 (Mainieri v. McLellan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mainieri v. McLellan, 211 A.2d 239, 125 Vt. 157, 1965 Vt. LEXIS 216 (Vt. 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The amount of agreed damages was entered on the plaintiff’s portion of the verdict form, prior to its delivery to the foreman of the jury upon submission. The trial court noted this circum-' stance in his charge. Here, the defendants argue that the mere presence of this entry on the form may have inclined the jury to find in favor of the plaintiff. This would require a presumption, which we will not indulge, that the jury declined to follow the instructions of the presiding judge that they, were bound to decide between the plaintiff and *158 the defendants on the fair balance of the evidence. Lewis v. Gagne, 123 Vt. 217, 219, 185 A. 2d 468.

Moreover, this issue was not presented to the trial court so as to give that tribunal an opportunity to take corrective action, if required. Merrill v. Reed, 123 Vt. 248, 254-5,185 A. 2d 737.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silva v. Stevens
589 A.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1991)
Sunday v. Stratton Corp.
390 A.2d 398 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1978)
State v. Barrett
320 A.2d 621 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 A.2d 239, 125 Vt. 157, 1965 Vt. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mainieri-v-mclellan-vt-1965.