Maines v. State

523 P.2d 420, 90 Nev. 236, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 368
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 1974·No. No. 7345·Published

Opinion

[237]*237OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from an order denying a petition for habeas relief, presented under the provisions of Nevada’s post-conviction procedure statutes. NRS 177.315 to NRS 177.385.

NRS 177.375(1) provides: “If the petitioner’s conviction was upon a plea of guilty, all claims for post-conviction relief are waived except the claim that the plea was involuntarily entered.” In our view, when the district court accepted appellant’s plea of guilty to Counts I and II of the information against him, the court adequately canvassed him to assure that the plea was made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and consequences of the plea. NRS 174.035(1); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); Heffley v. Warden, 89 Nev. 645, 516 P.2d 1403 (1973).

Moreover, appellant’s further contention, that he possessed a legal defense to Count II of the information, because it had once been dismissed pursuant to bargained plea of guilty to Count I of the information, is not well taken. Where, as occurred in this case, the count is dismissed as part of a bargained plea which is later repudiated by a defendant, the charge may be reinstated against him. See: People v. Kirkpatrick, 498 P.2d 992 (Cal. 1972); In Re Sutherland, 493 P.2d 857 (Cal. 1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maines v. State, 523 P.2d 420, 90 Nev. 236, 1974 Nev. LEXIS 368 (Neb. 1974).

523 P.2d 420 (Maines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
In Re Sutherland
493 P.2d 857 (California Supreme Court, 1972)
Heffley v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
516 P.2d 1403 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Kirkpatrick
498 P.2d 992 (California Supreme Court, 1972)