Mainelli v. Haberstroh

344 F.2d 965
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 20, 1965·No. No. 15157·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C., 237 F.Supp. 190.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 344 F.2d 965 (3d Cir. 1965).

344 F.2d 965 (Mainelli v. Haberstroh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.
760 F.2d 481 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Herrera v. Valentine
653 F.2d 1220 (Eighth Circuit, 1981)
Legette v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
478 F. Supp. 1069 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
Besse v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
79 F.R.D. 623 (D. Minnesota, 1978)
Smith v. Lees
431 F. Supp. 923 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1977)
Delores Taken Alive v. Melvin Litzau
551 F.2d 196 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)