Mainelli v. Haberstroh

Third Circuit

Mainelli v. Haberstroh

344 F.2d 965, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1965

Docket15157

StatusPublished

This text of 344 F.2d 965 (Mainelli v. Haberstroh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mainelli v. Haberstroh, 344 F.2d 965, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

344 F.2d 965

Mamie J. MAINELLI and Nicholas Mainelli
v.
Alfred HABERSTROH and Marie Haberstroh, Individually and Doing Business as Hill Top Rest, Pleasant Mount, Wayne County, Pennsylvania, Mamie J. Mainelli, Appellant.

No. 15157.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1965.

Decided May 20, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; William J., Nealon, Jr., Judge.

Milford J. Meyer, Meyer, Lasch, Hankin & Poul, Philadelphia, Pa. (Louis A. Fine, Honesdale, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Hugh J. McMenamin, Warren, Hill, Henkelman & McMenamin, Scranton, Pa. (Harvey Gelb, Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed. D.C., 237 F.Supp. 190.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI