Maine v. Moreshead

506 A.2d 220, 1986 Me. LEXIS 711
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 7, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 506 A.2d 220 (Maine v. Moreshead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maine v. Moreshead, 506 A.2d 220, 1986 Me. LEXIS 711 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

On appeal from his conviction for tampering with a witness, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 454 (1983), George Moreshead contends that the prosecutor’s statement in closing argument that the defendant had lied on the witness stand constitutes obvious error. Because the record discloses that the prosecutor did not state his opinion as to the defendant’s credibility in violation of M. Bar R. 3.7(e)(2)(v), but permissibly attacked his credibility by “analyzing the evidence and highlighting ... discrepancies” in the testimony, we deny the appeal. State v. Smith, 456 A.2d 16, 17 (Me.1983).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
456 A.2d 16 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 A.2d 220, 1986 Me. LEXIS 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maine-v-moreshead-me-1986.