Mailloux v. State

816 So. 2d 808, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2002 WL 992158
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 2002·No. No. 1D01-4698·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he sought 115 days of additional jail credit where he was held in custody in two counties on separate warrants and subsequently sentenced to concurrent sentences in those two cases. See Travis v. State, 724 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Penny v. State, 778 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The trial court denied the appellant’s claim without record attachments. Because the appellant stated a facially sufficient claim for relief that is supported by the record, we reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KAHN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mailloux v. State, 816 So. 2d 808, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2002 WL 992158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

816 So. 2d 808 (Mailloux v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hansen v. State
816 So. 2d 808 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)