Mailloux v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mailloux v. State

816 So. 2d 808, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2002 WL 992158

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 16, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-4698

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 808 (Mailloux v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mailloux v. State, 816 So. 2d 808, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2002 WL 992158 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he sought 115 days of additional jail credit where he was held in custody in two counties on separate warrants and subsequently sentenced to concurrent sentences in those two cases. See Travis v. State, 724 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Penny v. State, 778 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The trial court denied the appellant’s claim without record attachments. Because the appellant stated a facially sufficient claim for relief that is supported by the record, we reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KAHN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), in which he sought 115 days of additional jail credit where he was held in custody in two counties on separate warrants and subsequently sentenced to concurrent sentences in those two cases. See Travis v. State, 724 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Penny v. State, 778 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The trial court denied the appellant’s claim without record attachments. Because the appellant stated a facially sufficient claim for relief that is supported by the record, we reverse and remand for the trial court to support its denial with record attachments or to grant the relief sought.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

KAHN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 808, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6640, 2002 WL 992158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mailloux-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack