MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins
846 N.E.2d 1220, 6 N.Y.3d 841, 813 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 686
Opinion
On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken on behalf of H.T.A., Inc. by Rupert Higgins, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that Rupert Higgins is not H.T.A., Inc.’s authorized legal representative (see CPLR 321 [a]); appeal, insofar as taken by Rupert Higgins on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay etc. dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins, 846 N.E.2d 1220, 6 N.Y.3d 841, 813 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 686 (N.Y. 2006).
846 N.E.2d 1220 (MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.