MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins

New York Court of Appeals

MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins

846 N.E.2d 1220, 6 N.Y.3d 841, 813 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 686

DecidedApril 4, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 846 N.E.2d 1220 (MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins, 846 N.E.2d 1220, 6 N.Y.3d 841, 813 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 686 (N.Y. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken on behalf of H.T.A., Inc. by Rupert Higgins, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that Rupert Higgins is not H.T.A., Inc.’s authorized legal representative (see CPLR 321 [a]); appeal, insofar as taken by Rupert Higgins on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay etc. dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken on behalf of H.T.A., Inc. by Rupert Higgins, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that Rupert Higgins is not H.T.A., Inc.’s authorized legal representative (see CPLR 321 [a]); appeal, insofar as taken by Rupert Higgins on his own behalf, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for a stay etc. dismissed as academic.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 N.E.2d 1220, 6 N.Y.3d 841, 813 N.Y.S.2d 710, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mail-boxes-etc-usa-inc-v-higgins-ny-2006.