MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins
756 N.E.2d 76, 96 N.Y.2d 895, 730 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2054
Opinion
Appeal taken on behalf of H.T.A., Inc. by Rupert Higgins dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that Rupert Higgins is not the authorized legal representative of H.T.A., Inc. (see, CPLR 321 [a]); appeal taken by Rupert Higgins on his own behalf dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that he is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins, 756 N.E.2d 76, 96 N.Y.2d 895, 730 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2054 (N.Y. 2001).
756 N.E.2d 76 (MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.