MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins

756 N.E.2d 76, 96 N.Y.2d 895, 730 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2054
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 10, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 756 N.E.2d 76 (MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. Higgins, 756 N.E.2d 76, 96 N.Y.2d 895, 730 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2054 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Appeal taken on behalf of H.T.A., Inc. by Rupert Higgins dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that Rupert Higgins is not the authorized legal representative of H.T.A., Inc. (see, CPLR 321 [a]); appeal taken by Rupert Higgins on his own behalf dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that he is not an aggrieved party within the meaning of CPLR 5511.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 N.E.2d 76, 96 N.Y.2d 895, 730 N.Y.S.2d 788, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 2054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mail-boxes-etc-usa-inc-v-higgins-ny-2001.