Maiden v. Maiden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Maiden v. Maiden

234 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2007 WL 2176366

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 31, 2007

DocketED 87944

StatusPublished

This text of 234 S.W.3d 542 (Maiden v. Maiden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maiden v. Maiden, 234 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2007 WL 2176366 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeannette Maiden (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding that she denied or interfered with visitation and imposing a fine on her. Mother’s sole point on appeal alleges that the trial court erred in failing to review the original visitation schedule after a permissible non court-ordered relocation occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI