Maiden v. Maiden

234 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2007 WL 2176366
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 2007·No. ED 87944·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeannette Maiden (“Mother”) appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding that she denied or interfered with visitation and imposing a fine on her. Mother’s sole point on appeal alleges that the trial court erred in failing to review the original visitation schedule after a permissible non court-ordered relocation occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maiden v. Maiden, 234 S.W.3d 542, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1078, 2007 WL 2176366 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

234 S.W.3d 542 (Maiden v. Maiden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Michael
234 S.W.3d 542 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)