Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin

5 Misc. 2d 328, 159 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1243

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 20, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the absence of allegation and proof of plans for the erection of the new structure, the landlord was not entitled to a final order for the purpose of demolishing the existing building.

Upon the termination of the written lease, the tenants became statutory tenants and the jury waiver clause of the lease was carried over into the statutory tenancy (Jamaica Investors v. Blacharsh, 193 Misc. 949).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for tenants, with costs. The intermediate order should be affirmed.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In the absence of allegation and proof of plans for the erection of the new structure, the landlord was not entitled to a final order for the purpose of demolishing the existing building.

Upon the termination of the written lease, the tenants became statutory tenants and the jury waiver clause of the lease was carried over into the statutory tenancy (Jamaica Investors v. Blacharsh, 193 Misc. 949).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for tenants, with costs. The intermediate order should be affirmed.

Hofstadter, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin, 5 Misc. 2d 328, 159 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

5 Misc. 2d 328 (Maiden Lane Service Stations, Inc. v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related