Maida v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board
390 N.E.2d 777, 47 N.Y.2d 719, 417 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1994
This text of 390 N.E.2d 777 (Maida v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maida v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board, 390 N.E.2d 777, 47 N.Y.2d 719, 417 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1994 (N.Y. 1979).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 942).
[721]*721Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
390 N.E.2d 777, 47 N.Y.2d 719, 417 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maida-v-new-york-city-teachers-retirement-board-ny-1979.