Maida v. Maida

703 So. 2d 1232, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 25, 1998 WL 2414
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 1998·No. No. 96-2971·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Kirwan v. Kirwan, 606 So.2d 771 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Smith v. Smith, 571 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), cause dismissed, 576 So.2d 291 (Fla.1991); Goldman v. Goldman, 529 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Jimenez v. Jimenez, 309 So.2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maida v. Maida, 703 So. 2d 1232, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 25, 1998 WL 2414 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

703 So. 2d 1232 (Maida v. Maida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kirwan v. Kirwan
606 So. 2d 771 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Goldman v. Goldman
529 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Jimenez v. Jimenez
309 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Smith v. Smith
571 So. 2d 1384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)