Maicas v. . Leony
20 N.E. 586, 113 N.Y. 619, 68 Sickels 619, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 990
Opinion
reads for affirmance of order of General Term, which affirmed order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion for the appointment of a referee to take and state the accounts, and for affirmance of the other order of General Term and the order of Special Term affirmed by it so far as they vacate and set aside the report of the referee and the interlocutory judgment, and for reversal of the said orders in other respects, so that the case may stand for further trial before the referee.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maicas v. . Leony, 20 N.E. 586, 113 N.Y. 619, 68 Sickels 619, 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 990 (N.Y. 1889).
20 N.E. 586 (Maicas v. . Leony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abrams v. Textile Realty Corp.
197 Misc. 25 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Baker v. Roddy
97 Misc. 264 (New York County Courts, 1916)
Smith v. . State of New York
108 N.E. 214 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Jonah v. Clark
88 A. 395 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1913)
Pinsker v. Pinsker
44 A.D. 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Mitchell v. Village of White Plains
9 A.D. 258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Salisbury v. Binghamton Pub. Co.
32 N.Y.S. 652 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Garczynski v. Russell
27 N.Y.S. 458 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Seymour v. Spring Forest Cemetery Ass'n
19 N.Y.S. 94 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Klein v. Continental Insurance
17 N.Y.S. 218 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Ryerson v. Ryerson
7 N.Y.S. 726 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)