Mai v. NYS Dept. of Welfare

Second Circuit

Mai v. NYS Dept. of Welfare

14 F. App'x 123

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJuly 19, 2001

DocketDocket No. 00-9455

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F. App'x 123 (Mai v. NYS Dept. of Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mai v. NYS Dept. of Welfare, 14 F. App'x 123 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Allyne R. Ross, Judge) dismissing Hong Mai’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After reviewing the arguments raised by Hong Mai, we find them to be without merit.

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Allyne R. Ross, Judge) dismissing Hong Mai’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After reviewing the arguments raised by Hong Mai, we find them to be without merit.

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F. App'x 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mai-v-nys-dept-of-welfare-ca2-2001.