Mai Khank Tran v. State
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00156-CR
____________
MAI KHANH TRAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Criminal Court at Law No. 11
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 5503
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant, Mai Khanh Tran, appeals a conviction for failure to signal a right turn. See Tex. Trans. Code Ann. ' 544.104(b). Tran pleaded Anot guilty@ in the municipal court. The court found her guilty and assessed her punishment at a $75.00 fine. Tran=s motion for new trial was denied and she appealed to the County Criminal Court at Law. The Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 affirmed Tran=s conviction.
Initially, we must decide whether we have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We find we do not and dismiss Tran=s appeal.
Unless the appellant raises the constitutionality of the statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based, we only have jurisdiction over such an appeal if the fine assessed against the defendant exceeds $100 and the municipal court judgment is affirmed by the county criminal court at law. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 4.03; Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 30.00688. No such issue has been raised by Tran on appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction because the monetary fine does not exceed $100, exclusive of costs. See Boyd v. State, 11 S.W.3d 324, 325 (Tex. App. B Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Boyce.
Do not publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mai Khank Tran v. State (Mai Khank Tran v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.