Mahurin v. State
265 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2008 WL 707291
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, James Mahurin, appeals from the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find that no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahurin v. State, 265 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2008 WL 707291 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
265 S.W.3d 280 (Mahurin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Bannister v. Goldman
265 S.W.3d 280 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)