Mahurin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mahurin v. State

265 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2008 WL 707291

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 2008

DocketED 89373

StatusPublished

This text of 265 S.W.3d 280 (Mahurin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahurin v. State, 265 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2008 WL 707291 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, James Mahurin, appeals from the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find that no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, James Mahurin, appeals from the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and find that no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 S.W.3d 280, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 359, 2008 WL 707291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahurin-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack