Mahorner v. Harrison

21 Miss. 53
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1849·Published

Opinion

Mr. 'Chief Justice Sharkey

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This bill was filed by Hooe in his lifetime, in the vice-chancery court, to compel respondent to convey the land therein mentioned to complainant.

The record in the case contains near six hundred pages of manuscript, closely written, made up mostly of the evidence of the case, which, besides the depositions of many witnesses, consists of a lengthy and almost continuous correspondence, which was kept up for several years. It is impossible that we can do more than advert to a few of the leading features in the case, as disclosed by this mass of matter, not the most satisfactory, and give the impressions left upon the mind by the examination.

The foundation on which the trust is sought to be established, is an alleged agreement between complainant and respondent, [55]*55that the latter should invest the funds to be sent for that purpose in lands in Mississippi and Alabama.

Hooe was a citizen of Yirginia, and so was Harrison until the latter part of 1831. Hooe was wealthy, and the respondent, who was in limited circumstances, married the daughter of Hooe, in 1831. By the advice of complainant, as it is alleged, respondent agreed to come to Alabama, and examine and endeavor to acquire lands for the complainant, in part, in the country which had been recently purchased from the Choctaw Indians. The complainant furnished respondent Avith a sum of money ($400) and other requisites for the journey, and placed in his possession sixteen slaves, taking a receipt for them, the terms of which are unknoAvn, though it was probably intended by Hooe to enable him to establish a loan of the slaves, in case of necessity. The respondent insists that it was an advancement.

The allegations of the bill, as respects the agreement to invest money for complainant, are denied. The receipt of considerable sums of money at different times, is admitted, but it is insisted that they too were intended as advancements, to be invested for the sole benefit of respondent, for the purpose of securing a home for himself and family, and for laying the foundation of a future fortune.

The defendant left Yirginia with his family, and, after having stopped some time at Huntsville, located in Pickens county, Alabama, Avhere he laid the foundation for future acquisitions of a large body of land. Not very long aftenvards he commenced an examination of the surrounding country, Avith a vieAV to other locations, all of Avhich he did under the advice of the complainant. The letters Avhich passed, prove conclusively that the defendant had no means of his own. He made frequent calls for small sums to defray current expenses, and received them from complainant. The letters of complainant abound in promises of money to aid defendant in his views, to such an extent as might be necessary. The land on which Harrison settled, had not then been brought into market. The pre-emption laws, however, conferred certain privileges on actual settlers, and by making a settlement of his oAvn, and by securing the rights of [56]*56others, he expected ultimately to acquire title to as much land, around his settlement, as he desired. Money was not wanted immediately, and the promises of complainant were made in view of the approaching land sales, or when the land could be entered.

After the respondent had made his settlement in Alabama, his attention was directed to land on the Noxubee river, in Mississippi, about eight miles from his place in Alabama, and he became desirous of securing a location here also, with a view, no doubt, to further acquisitions around it. As the respondent was dependent on complainant for means, and disposed, no doubt, to pay great deference to his opinions, he disclosed his views fully in reference to his plans, and the advantages of the country, and value of the lands. The Noxubee lands occupy a prominent place in the correspondence. It was not very long before the respondent acquired a foothold there, by the purchase of one or two Indian reserves.

As the necessities of respondent required, in the accomplishment of his objects, the complainant made remittances to meet them.

The complainant had, in the mean time, been induced by the favorable accounts given him, to desire a location in the vicinity of the respondent, and had expressed this wish, and his intention on the subject to Harrison. That such was a part of his original scheme when he advised Harrison to leave Virginia, is by no means certain. Probably this desire was superinduced by the accounts which he received as to the value of the land and its product, and the field for speculation opened to his view in this new region or country. This, however, is an immaterial cir-' cumstance, so far as it may influence the trust. It is immaterial whether he originally entertained the design of having land purchased for him or not. If, after Harrison had pointed out the advantages, and proffered his aid, Hooe furnished him with money to be invested in land for himself, it is still a trust.

The leading objects of each of the parties must be kept in view, as gathered from the correspondence, in order that we may be enabled to arrive at a just conclusion on the particular matter [57]*57in controversy. Hooe was a man of great wealth, residing in Virginia. It is intimated that he was opposed to the marriage of Harrison with his daughter. The marriage having taken place, however, his feelings evidently changed. All his letters are of the most friendly character. Indeed, they manifest the kindest parental feeling. Harrison was poor, and had moved to a new country at the suggestion of Hooe. He of course required, and had a right to expect, aid in his enterprise. This was promised by Hooe in almost every letter. His intention to bestow liberally is manifest, and if he did not intend to give Harrison a fortune, he certainly intended to place at his command sufficient means to lay the foundation of a fortune. His profuse promises were soon followed by liberal advances, to suit Harrison’s wishes. With a fortune at his command, he seems to have enjoyed a pleasure in being able to afford the means of placing his son-in-law in a like condition. That much of the money remitted was intended as advancements to Harrison, cannot be questioned. His good feeling was fully reciprocated by Harrison. Each seems to have been desirous to serve the other; they mutually sought to preserve each other’s interest; not doubting but they could ultimately arrange the product of their enterprises to suit the views of both. The letters of Harrison would induce the belief that he was acting with the design of leaving every thing at the discretion of Hooe; the letters of Hooe would induce the belief that his main object was to serve Harrison. They mutually reposed the most unlimited confidence in each other, and it is therefore difficult to define their rights, as their intentions were not declared with certainty. With Harrison, there was evidently a leading object, it was to secure a home, surrounded by a handsome landed estate; it was Hooe’s object, above all others, to aid in this design. Supposing this to be the object, it was natural that Harrison should have turned his attention to more places than one. The land had not been offered for sale.— competition might defeat him in regard to his place in Alabama. To meet such an emergency, he became desirous to have a foothold in Noxubee. Indeed he expressed this to be his object in part.

But it is also clear that Hooe, in the mean time, had conceived' [58]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahorner v. Harrison, 21 Miss. 53 (Mich. 1849).

21 Miss. 53 (Mahorner v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.