Mahoning Valley Railway Co. v. Harnett

83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 480
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1910
DocketNo. 12248
StatusPublished

This text of 83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 480 (Mahoning Valley Railway Co. v. Harnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoning Valley Railway Co. v. Harnett, 83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 480 (Ohio 1910).

Opinion

Judgment of the circuit court reversed and judgment of the court of common pleas affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

This court is of opinion that, whether the answer in this case should be considered a plea charging contributory negligence on the part of -the plaintiff below, or not, the instruction given by the court of common pleas to the jury with respect to the subject of negligence and contributory negligence was and is not prejudicial to the rights of the plaintiff below, and that the circuit court erred in reversing the judgment of the court of common pleas upon the ground in its judgment [481]*481stated. It is therefore considered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of said circuit court be and the same is hereby reversed for error in reversing" and in not affirming the judgment of the court of common pleas. It is further considered that the said judgment of the court of common pleas be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Ohio St. (N.S.) 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoning-valley-railway-co-v-harnett-ohio-1910.