Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo
This text of 944 N.E.2d 1177 (Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.
Upon consideration of relator’s motion to remand, it is ordered by the court that the motion to remand is granted. This matter is hereby remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for consideration of whether respondent, James Vivo, suffers from a medical condition that disabled him from responding to the allegations made against him before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and for further action that the board deems necessary and appropriate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
944 N.E.2d 1177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoning-cty-bar-assn-v-vivo-ohio-2011.