Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo

944 N.E.2d 1177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1452
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 12, 2011·No. 2011-0299·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Upon consideration of relator’s motion to remand, it is ordered by the court that the motion to remand is granted. This matter is hereby remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for consideration of whether respondent, James Vivo, suffers from a medical condition that disabled him from responding to the allegations made against him before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline and for further action that the board deems necessary and appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo, 944 N.E.2d 1177, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1452 (Ohio 2011).

944 N.E.2d 1177 (Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Vivo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trumbull County Bar Ass'n v. Ohlin
2012 Ohio 4565 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)