Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Alexander

Ohio Supreme Court

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Alexander

677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3628

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 1, 1997

DocketDD-100

StatusPublished

This text of 677 N.E.2d 355 (Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahoning Cty. Bar Ass'n v. Alexander, 677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3628 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

On February 18,1997, relator, Mahoning County Bar Association, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, George M. Alexander, to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt of this court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is, hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On February 18,1997, relator, Mahoning County Bar Association, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent, George M. Alexander, to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt of this court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion be, and is, hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 N.E.2d 355, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1444, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoning-cty-bar-assn-v-alexander-ohio-1997.