Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Theofilos
521 N.E.2d 797, 36 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 81
Opinions
This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rule. While we adopt the board’s findings, we find that respondent’s conduct requires a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Theofilos, 521 N.E.2d 797, 36 Ohio St. 3d 43, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 81 (Ohio 1988).
521 N.E.2d 797 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Theofilos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 5288 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomlan
118 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Saridakis
936 A.2d 886 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Stein
819 A.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2003)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Cook
2002 Ohio 5787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
1996 Ohio 421 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
666 N.E.2d 1083 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Sheehy
1995 Ohio 315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clark
1994 Ohio 233 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Theofilos
539 N.E.2d 634 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)