Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pagac

539 N.E.2d 634, 43 Ohio St. 3d 611, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 116
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 14, 1989
DocketNo. D.D. 87-32
StatusPublished

This text of 539 N.E.2d 634 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pagac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pagac, 539 N.E.2d 634, 43 Ohio St. 3d 611, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 116 (Ohio 1989).

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

The application of respondent, Paul Pagac III, for reinstatement to the practice of law is granted, on the condition that respondent pay within one year the outstanding costs taxed against him in this matter in payments of not less than $500 each month. If this condition is not met, respondent’s suspension will resume until this debt is paid in full.

(For earlier case, see [1988], 39 Ohio St. 3d 1, 528 N.E. 2d 948.)

Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Pagac
528 N.E.2d 948 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 N.E.2d 634, 43 Ohio St. 3d 611, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoning-county-bar-assn-v-pagac-ohio-1989.