Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Koury

611 N.E.2d 814, 66 Ohio St. 3d 254
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 19, 1993·No. No. 91-2166·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings of misconduct by the board. However we differ with the board’s recommendation. We instead adopt the original recommendation of relator and order that respondent be publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Resnick, J., dissent, adopt the recommendation of the board, and would order that respondent be suspended for six months, which suspension would be stayed as long as respondent commits no further violations for a period of three years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Koury, 611 N.E.2d 814, 66 Ohio St. 3d 254 (Ohio 1993).

611 N.E.2d 814 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Koury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Koury
1997 Ohio 91 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)