Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino

642 N.E.2d 342, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 7, 1994·No. No. 94-1861·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on the condition that no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel during that time. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino, 642 N.E.2d 342, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95 (Ohio 1994).

642 N.E.2d 342 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahoning County Bar Association v. DiMartino
2016 Ohio 5665 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino
2010 Ohio 247 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)