Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino

642 N.E.2d 342, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 1994
DocketNo. 94-1861
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 642 N.E.2d 342 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino, 642 N.E.2d 342, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95 (Ohio 1994).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on the condition that no disciplinary complaints against respondent are certified to the board by a probable cause panel during that time. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mahoning County Bar Association v. DiMartino
2016 Ohio 5665 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. DiMartino
2010 Ohio 247 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 N.E.2d 342, 71 Ohio St. 3d 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoning-county-bar-assn-v-dimartino-ohio-1994.