Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Cregan

Ohio Supreme Court

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Cregan

634 N.E.2d 1005, 69 Ohio St. 3d 550

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 13, 1994·No. No. 93-2181·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. We cannot hope to “maintain some control over” Cregan by suspending him. We have already tried that. His conduct has shown that he is not amenable to that kind of control. The task of controlling Cregan’s behavior must now rest with the psychiatric profession and/or the police.

[554]*554Accordingly, Lawrence V. Cregan is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. We cannot hope to “maintain some control over” Cregan by suspending him. We have already tried that. His conduct has shown that he is not amenable to that kind of control. The task of controlling Cregan’s behavior must now rest with the psychiatric profession and/or the police.

[554]*554Accordingly, Lawrence V. Cregan is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright, J., not participating.

Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Cregan, 634 N.E.2d 1005, 69 Ohio St. 3d 550 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

634 N.E.2d 1005 (Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Cregan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related