Mahoney v. Weitelmann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Mahoney v. Weitelmann

1935 OK 984, 50 P.2d 1094, 174 Okla. 591, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1319

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

DocketNo. 25060.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1935 OK 984 (Mahoney v. Weitelmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahoney v. Weitelmann, 1935 OK 984, 50 P.2d 1094, 174 Okla. 591, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1319 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

RILEY, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and decree canceling a resale tax deed and quieting title to the lot involved in defendant in error.

The resale tax deed contains the same defect as the one involved in Mahoney v. Estep, 171 Okla. 101, 38 P. (2d) 537, and therein held to be void upon its face.

The judgment and decree below held the resale deed void and voidable. Under the rule announced in Mahoney v. Estep, supra, it was void upon its face. Under said rule the judgment and decree must be. and is hereby, affirmed.

' McNEILL, O. X, and BUSBY, PHELPS, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI