Mahoney v. Sharma
110 A.D.2d 627, 487 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48522
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Absent competent medical proof of the causal connection between the alleged negligence and the death of the original plaintiff, the granting of leave to amend the complaint constituted an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Fiorentino v Cobble Hill Nursing Home, 101 AD2d 825; Ortiz v Bono, 101 AD2d 812; Smith v Hellman, 57 AD2d 566; Wood v Southside Hosp., 45 AD2d 1052). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahoney v. Sharma, 110 A.D.2d 627, 487 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 627 (Mahoney v. Sharma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Feinberg v. Walter B. Cooke, Inc.
240 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Padula v. Bucalo
214 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Artese v. Brooklyn Longshoremen's Medical Center
168 A.D.2d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Kirchmeyer v. S. Subramanian
167 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Ullrich v. Rocking Horse Ranch, Inc.
138 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
McGuire v. Small
129 A.D.2d 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Shapiro v. Beer
121 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)