Mahoney v. Seaman
This text of 7 A.D.3d 494 (Mahoney v. Seaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), entered May 21, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not [495]*495sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts, with costs, and the motion is denied.
There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.D.3d 494, 775 N.Y.S.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-seaman-nyappdiv-2004.