Home/Supreme Court/Mahoney v. Parole Board

Mahoney v. Parole Board

344 U.S. 871, 73 S. Ct. 173, 97 L. Ed. 675, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 1556
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 10, 1952
DocketNo. 387
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 344 U.S. 871 (Mahoney v. Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoney v. Parole Board, 344 U.S. 871, 73 S. Ct. 173, 97 L. Ed. 675, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 1556 (1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal [872]*872is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

Samuel Kagle for appellant. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fernandez
506 A.2d 1245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Powers v. Union City Bd. of Ed.
308 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 U.S. 871, 73 S. Ct. 173, 97 L. Ed. 675, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 1556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-parole-board-scotus-1952.