Mahoney v. Parole Board

344 U.S. 871, 73 S. Ct. 173, 97 L. Ed. 675, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 1556
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 10, 1952·No. No. 387·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal [872]*872is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

Samuel Kagle for appellant. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Eugene T. Urbaniak, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoney v. Parole Board, 344 U.S. 871, 73 S. Ct. 173, 97 L. Ed. 675, 1952 U.S. LEXIS 1556 (1952).

344 U.S. 871 (Mahoney v. Parole Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fernandez
506 A.2d 1245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Powers v. Union City Bd. of Ed.
308 A.2d 71 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)