Mahoney v. O'Shea Funeral Homes, Inc.

380 N.E.2d 297, 45 N.Y.2d 719, 408 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2182
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1978·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In light of the existence of commercially zoned lots in the area surrounding the subject premises, one of which was rezoned from residential to commercial as recently as 1970, we believe that the amendment to the zoning ordinance was not arbitrary and is, therefore, constitutional as applied. [721]*721Unless shown to be arbitrary, the decision of the local legislative body to zone or rezone property is conclusive and beyond judicial interference. (McGowan v Cohalan, 41 NY2d 434, 438.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoney v. O'Shea Funeral Homes, Inc., 380 N.E.2d 297, 45 N.Y.2d 719, 408 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2182 (N.Y. 1978).

380 N.E.2d 297 (Mahoney v. O'Shea Funeral Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.
814 A.2d 469 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Haines v. City of Phoenix
727 P.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Mangicapre v. Town of Hempstead
97 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Collard v. Incorporated Village of Flower Hill
421 N.E.2d 818 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)