Mahoney v. Norcross

187 N.E. 227, 284 Mass. 153, 1933 Mass. LEXIS 1065
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by51 cases

This text of 187 N.E. 227 (Mahoney v. Norcross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoney v. Norcross, 187 N.E. 227, 284 Mass. 153, 1933 Mass. LEXIS 1065 (Mass. 1933).

Opinion

By the Court.

The case at bar falls within the general principle that in an action arising from a collision between automobiles at intersecting streets the due care and contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the negligence, of the defendant present questions of fact. The finding in favor of the plaintiff imports a finding of all subsidiary facts essential to that conclusion and must stand unless unsupported by the evidence. Without summarizing the testimony it is enough to say that a finding in favor of the plaintiff was warranted. Ferreira v. Zaccolanti, 281 Mass. 91.

The defendant presented several requests for rulings which were refused because based on assumptions of facts not in accord with the facts found by the trial judge. It is not [154]*154necessary to examine such requests because they are immaterial in view of the facts found. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co. 210 Mass. 8, 18. Castano v. Leone, 278 Mass. 429.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DiLuzio v. UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WKRS.
461 N.E.2d 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1984)
DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America
461 N.E.2d 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1984)
Adams v. Elliott
1982 Mass. App. Div. 315 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1982)
Haverhill Builders Supply, Inc. v. Ortins
58 Mass. App. Dec. 65 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1976)
Franco v. Marinow
58 Mass. App. Dec. 29 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1976)
Nelson v. Judd
49 Mass. App. Dec. 14 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1972)
Karas v. LeVay
38 Mass. App. Dec. 179 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1967)
Reis v. Ronny & Dannie Corp.
24 Mass. App. Dec. 107 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1962)
Martin v. Reis
181 N.E.2d 580 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Levin v. Ginsberg
22 Mass. App. Dec. 72 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1961)
Rocco v. Boston-Leader, Inc.
17 Mass. App. Dec. 65 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1959)
Butler v. Cromartie
15 Mass. App. Dec. 164 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1958)
New York Central Railroad v. Marinucci Bros. & Co.
149 N.E.2d 680 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1958)
Mason v. City of Boston
12 Mass. App. Dec. 14 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1956)
Cadiero v. Joyce
9 Mass. App. Dec. 21 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)
Smith v. Morrison
8 Mass. App. Dec. 152 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)
Dineen v. Falbo
7 Mass. App. Dec. 123 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1954)
Fallon v. Landers
7 Mass. App. Dec. 71 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1954)
Capone v. Lacarbonara
3 Mass. App. Dec. 67 (Boston Municipal Court, 1951)
Coughlin v. First National Stores, Inc.
11 Mass. App. Div. 225 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 N.E. 227, 284 Mass. 153, 1933 Mass. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-norcross-mass-1933.