Mahoney v. Miller

32 A.2d 569, 133 N.J. Eq. 530, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 478
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 30, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.2d 569 (Mahoney v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoney v. Miller, 32 A.2d 569, 133 N.J. Eq. 530, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 478 (N.J. 1943).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

A judgment was recovered in the New York courts by one Edward H. Titus. The complainant in this case was the referee in that action. His fees have not been paid. Titus died a resident of Bergen County. His executor qualified.

Complainant fearing that a compromise of the judgment might imperil his right to his fees procured a Chancery decree, whereby the amount of his fees were fixed and declared to be an interest in the judgment. Also a trustee thereof was appointed. Testator’s brother, who was not a party to that action, then filed a bill in Chancery claiming that the *531 judgment was assigned to him in his brother’s lifetime and that the executor has no interest therein.

Complainant appeals because the Vice-Chancellor retained this bill for final hearing and refused to dismiss the action.

Whatever rights the complainant may have will be taken care of in that action. The action taken by the Vice-Chancellor found support in the exercise of a sound discretion.

The order appealed from is. affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.2d 569, 133 N.J. Eq. 530, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-miller-nj-1943.