Mahoney v. Lomenzo

21 A.D.2d 971, 252 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Presidential electors are, in our view, “candidates for election to public office”. (Election Law, §§ 130, 131, subd. 1; § 139, subd. 1.) We pass on no other question. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur. [43 Misc 2d 1094.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoney v. Lomenzo, 21 A.D.2d 971, 252 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

21 A.D.2d 971 (Mahoney v. Lomenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Socialist Workers Campaign '84 v. New York State Board of Elections
105 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)