Mahoney v. Lensink
554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 806, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 46
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ eross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 130, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the enactment of General Statutes § 17-206k waive the sovereign immunity of the state with respect to violations of General Statutes §§ 17-206b and 17-206c?
“2. Did the allegations of the plaintiffs’ complaint sufficiently allege a violation of General Statutes §§ 17-206b and 17-2G6c?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mahoney v. Lensink, 554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 806, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 46 (Colo. 1989).
554 A.2d 743 (Mahoney v. Lensink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Hass v. University of State, No. Cv 99 69640 S (Aug. 17, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 11376 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Mahoney v. Lensink
569 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)
Roach v. Roach
568 A.2d 1037 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)