Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Mahoney v. Lensink

Mahoney v. Lensink

554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 806, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 46
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJanuary 12, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 554 A.2d 743 (Mahoney v. Lensink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mahoney v. Lensink, 554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 806, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 46 (Colo. 1989).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ eross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 130, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the enactment of General Statutes § 17-206k waive the sovereign immunity of the state with respect to violations of General Statutes §§ 17-206b and 17-206c?

“2. Did the allegations of the plaintiffs’ complaint sufficiently allege a violation of General Statutes §§ 17-206b and 17-2G6c?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Hass v. University of State, No. Cv 99 69640 S (Aug. 17, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 11376 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Mahoney v. Lensink
569 A.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)
Roach v. Roach
568 A.2d 1037 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
554 A.2d 743, 210 Conn. 806, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-lensink-conn-1989.