Mahoney v. Kraut

New York Court of Appeals

Mahoney v. Kraut

65 N.Y. 1011

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 10, 1985·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 685; see also, Matter of Oak Is. Beach Assn. v Flacke, 96 AD2d 841, lv denied 62 NY2d 606).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (111 AD2d 685; see also, Matter of Oak Is. Beach Assn. v Flacke, 96 AD2d 841, lv denied 62 NY2d 606).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Mahoney v. Kraut, 65 N.Y. 1011 (N.Y. 1985).

Pincite

65 N.Y. 1011 (Mahoney v. Kraut) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related