Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc.

342 F. Supp. 3d 206
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided September 20, 2018·No. Civil No. 17-11394-LTS·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

In a footnote, Plaintiff has also requested leave to amend his Amended Complaint again. Doc. No. 33 at 37 n.15. Plaintiff has already had substantial time to revise his allegations, previously amended his Complaint *218once, and in neither his opposition nor in any other document has Plaintiff asserted he could cure deficiencies identified by Defendant, let alone submitted support to back up such an assertion. Accordingly, this insufficient request to amend is denied, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc., 342 F. Supp. 3d 206 (D.D.C. 2018).

342 F. Supp. 3d 206 (Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related