Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc.

District of Columbia

Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc.

342 F. Supp. 3d 206

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedSeptember 20, 2018

DocketCivil No. 17-11394-LTS

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 342 F. Supp. 3d 206 (Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mahoney v. Found. Med., Inc., 342 F. Supp. 3d 206 (D.D.C. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

In a footnote, Plaintiff has also requested leave to amend his Amended Complaint again. Doc. No. 33 at 37 n.15. Plaintiff has already had substantial time to revise his allegations, previously amended his Complaint *218once, and in neither his opposition nor in any other document has Plaintiff asserted he could cure deficiencies identified by Defendant, let alone submitted support to back up such an assertion. Accordingly, this insufficient request to amend is denied, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a footnote, Plaintiff has also requested leave to amend his Amended Complaint again. Doc. No. 33 at 37 n.15. Plaintiff has already had substantial time to revise his allegations, previously amended his Complaint *218once, and in neither his opposition nor in any other document has Plaintiff asserted he could cure deficiencies identified by Defendant, let alone submitted support to back up such an assertion. Accordingly, this insufficient request to amend is denied, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 F. Supp. 3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mahoney-v-found-med-inc-dcd-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack