Mahoney v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

295 S.W.3d 602, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1624, 2009 WL 3849665
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2009·No. WD 70703·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a hearing pursuant to § 577.041 RSMo, the circuit court entered a judgment upholding the Director of Revenue’s revocation of Appellant Shane P. Mahoney’s driving privileges based on Ma-honey’s refusal to submit to a chemical test of his blood-alcohol content. On appeal, Mahoney argues that the Director failed to prove that, prior to his arrest, the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to suspect that Mahoney was driving while intoxicated. He also argues that § 577.041 violates the United States and Missouri Constitutions. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mahoney v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE, 295 S.W.3d 602, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1624, 2009 WL 3849665 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

295 S.W.3d 602 (Mahoney v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howell v. Rickard
295 S.W.3d 602 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)